Being The Hero – Story Writing Strategies and Techniques

« « Essential Elements in Language Arts Lesson Plans – Writing and Speaking  |  Writing Speaking – Appearing For a Dream Job Interview – Things That You Must Not Talk About » »

The Disparity Between Writing and Speaking

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009    Subscribe To Our Feed

About Speaking And Writing

Plenty of instructors on topics related to writing counsel that a student must write as he speaks. In ordinary words, the expressions he writes should be how he speaks them. It is as if there is no major dissimilarity between writing and speaking, or else such a dissimilarity is believed too small to make any disparity. Okay there is some certainty in that, that the language you speak can be used in any item you write. Excepting, of course, specific genres with their own lingo, such as law and electronics, where many expressions of the subjects are infrequently used in regular talking, though the words are easily known when people learned in those languages discuss them with each other.

But, beyond the mutual understanding of particular words in the ken of same-orientation chat, there is a fundamental disparitybetween speaking and writing, and it rests in the essential dissimilarity between the spoken word and written one amplified by the personality’s acuity and skills: the verbal word is ephemeral, while the written word is invariable.

Let us dissect the circumstances. When a word is stated orally its noise –and only the noise  moves via the listener’s ear and into his brain, where it is construed into the thought suggested by the sound made. That is where lie the complexities, since;

1) the spoken word is transitory

2) it can be interpreted merely by its sound

3) it is interpreted built on the glossary ofideas in the listener’s experience

4) a great number of homonyms and near-homonyms exist. 

Thus, most often, until a hardly-heard word is reiterated, its purposed connotation develops into a guessing activity for the listener. Thus a setback happens if the word would not be repeated

Conversely, the printed word is there on the paper until the paper itself crumbles, so the person can read it again and again until he perceives the sense if he did not interpret it correctly the first round. Furthermore, since it is written, the word’s concept is almost correct, differing merely by the context in which it was utilized. It is thus a lot easier to understand the written word as its planned idea is obvious right from the start. There is almost never any demand to restate the exact sentence; conversely, its reiteration via another form is desired. Also, more exact, archaic or highfalutin words may even be stated and nonetheless make the exposition understandable, if not better.

So when writing down a word, one can state it only one time and the reader can read it more than once if he needs to, to understand the word’s notion. on the other hand to form an loudly iterated notion, one will need to repeat the word numerous times to be understood, in particular if the word itself has sound-alike words and near-homonyms.  That is why public speakers talk in simpler language and repetitions to be heard fully or at least adequately by their audiences.

Naturally one can write as he speaks, but he can also ponder on the words of Confucius, “What you think you said may not be what I think I heard.” To read about something totally different visit this link warcraft gold and learn about buying world of warcraft gold for you character and take your game to the next level.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • Smarking
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • blinkbits
  • Reddit
  • Blue Dot
  • StumbleUpon
  • BlinkList
  • Spurl
  • Netscape

Leave a Reply